| |
Rowing as a Competitive Sport
One of the
many basic physical activities of man since
time immemorial in his routines of daily life,
involving the necessity of travel on water,
was that of propulsion of a floating craft.
At first, it might first have been by dipping
a hand in the water while straddling a log,
with a directional force, thereby accomplishing
water transportation in relative safety. Eventually,
through the ages as the human race developed
skills and their craft became more sophisticated,
there emerged a spirit of competition whether
as individuals or in groups, first as spontaneous
brushes followed eventually by direct challenge
that then led to the race. And now, in modern
times, there is hardly an activity of man,
including transportation on water that is
not a race in some form to become the best
in its class or among its peers.
Rowing in its present form, whether as individuals
or in group formations, had its start in England
in the late 1700's among the River watermen
whose life and living was tied to the water
and their craft. In their search for work,
gaining preference and profit could be enhanced
by being faster and more proficient than others
engaged in the same calling. Catering to individuals
or merchandise needing delivery somewhere
in the least time and greatest security, for
which service there was a fee, there were
usually men and craft ready and willing to
accommodate. Out of this desire and necessity
to be the best, planned improvement in men
and craft paved the way toward goals still
elusive and unreached.
Out of this original commercial aspect it
was natural that there developed a social
counterpart, both amateur and professional,
and a resulting tradition. When taken up by
the English aristocracy, rules of status and
conduct were developed that have ever since
been subject to conflict and debate as ethics
and social rights have advanced or regressed.
Though there have been periods of professionalism
in rowing, that phase had never gained strong
acceptance or support, partly due to its inability
to provide productive spectator participation.
Professionalism in rowing had its origin
together with rowing as amateur competition,
each enhanced by the other. In the age of
wind for power, ships in port waiting for
cargo or repairs had their own small boats
for service either sailed or rowed depending
on which was more practical for the situation.
These were supplemented by similar craft not
belonging to ships but based ashore, to provide
better or extra service, and those that were
better reaped the rewards of patronage. This
encouraged the spirit of competition, resulting
in challenges for entertainment when no work
for profit was available, followed by challenges
based on the pride and honor of the adversaries.
This prompted more aggressive competition
by wagers and in order to benefit financially,
it became necessary to have the best craft
available and rowers in commensurate physical
condition, which meant thought and planning
being given to boat design, equipment and
training.
By the early 1880's rowing as a sporting
activity, subject to rules and refinements,
had been established in England among the
colleges and aristocracy and by mid-century
had spread to the United States. The opportunity
for gain inevitably attracted the opportunists
and criminals with their betting, graft, gossip
and sabotage that, when detected, brought
scandal and disgrace. But this, fortunately,
was an aberration of short duration.
While there may have been unscrupulous or
criminal acts by the rough commercial rowers
in the brutal seafaring atmosphere of the
eighteenth and nineteenth century to gain
advantage over their competition, and in the
short lived days of professional rowing a
resort to illegal or unethical practices to
which they might be tempted, none of this
carried over into intercollegiate or club
rowing where sportsmanship and fair play have
prevailed. Almost without exception coaches
have been ex-oarsmen who continued by that
means their ingrown belief in the principles
of their heritage, and the few who have entertained
thoughts of gaining an advantage by some devious
means lost the respect of their contemporaries.
When eight oarsmen, or lesser number in a
smaller shell, is boated to compete in a brush
or a formal race, they are far removed from
the thought or act of taking unfair advantage
and willingly accept any detriment of water
or course that may be their lot. Their physical
conditioning, suitability of shell and rigging
and their coaching during training are where
they prepare for their coming ordeal to the
exclusion of other approaches. And once they
are on the line awaiting the starting signal,
there is no advice or urging of the coach,
substitution for any indisposition, interruption
for any relief or any action other than doing
their best that will get them to the finish
line first. Subject, of course, to the stipulated
time limits for restarts due to equipment
failure at the discretion of the referee.
And except for fleeting moments at some strategic
spot in a race course there can be no stimulation
of cheering spectators to accompany their
straining efforts. Any distraction or misapplication
of effort can only detract from the chance
to win laurels. Truly a single minded team
effort that hardly exists in any other sport.
The elite of England were the first to take
advantage of the opportunities of this sport
for status and for sporting pleasure, spectator
as well as participant. The first Oxford-Cambridge
rowing contest was held in 1829 to inaugurate
college competition but it was not until 1852
that the first Harvard-Yale race started the
trend in this country emulating the success
of the English innovation. As in any new interest,
improvements were necessary and forthcoming.
The slenderizing of hulls was a first consideration,
coordinated with the necessary adaptation
of riggers by 1850. Keels were eliminated
by 1860, the sliding seat arrived by 1870
and the swivel lock by 1880. There was continuing
controversy between English and American adoption
of many innovations based on the holding strength
of tradition against the recognition of improvement
in performance. Most of the early improvements
in design were of English inspiration but
the sliding seat and swivel lock were American.
Rowing was the first intercollegiate sport
in America and the forerunner of club rowing.
In the earlier competition 4's, 6's and 8's
were used over courses that included a turn
at the half way point, naturally called "turning
races," so that spectators could see
both start and finish. These were completely
unmanageable affairs, even after a coxswain
was added to provide control and leadership,
especially at the turn. It was not long before
college racing settled on 8's and the lesser
craft were the province of clubs and the turn
was abandoned in spite of its one spectator
advantage. In the U.S., training was conducted
at or as close as possible to the home grounds
of the institution but races were mainly held
at socially acceptable waters such as Lake
Winnepesaukee Lake, Quinsigamond, or Lake
Saratoga.
After the Civil War some degree of order
and purpose was established by forming the
RAAC (Rowing Association of American Colleges)
and by 1875 at Saratoga thirteen colleges
competed before crowds numbering into the
thousands, marred by all the vices attracted
by uncontrolled opportunities from within
and without. These divisive problems resulted
in Harvard and Yale withdrawing to engage
in what became their traditional annual contest
and the formation of the NAAO (National Association
of Amateur Oarsmen) to set amateur eligibility
standards and rules of conduct.
The advent of the National Association of
Amateur Oarsmen, combined with whatever were
the failings of the Rowing Association of
American Colleges brought about the eventual
dissolution of the latter and college rowing
was reduced haphazardly arranged races sponsored
by dedicated rowing enthusiasts, college classes
and alumni groups with no formal organization.
An attempt at revival of college rowing interest
and control was the organization of a race
a Poughkeepsie on the Hudson River which in
a few years was formalized as the IRA (Intercollegiate
Rowing Association) on a national and rational
scale. As new trophy sponsorship together
with institutional support and funding expanded
interest and participation there came into
being for the eastern part of the country
the EARC (Eastern Association of Rowing Colleges)
Sprints for both lightweight and heavyweight
crews; the Dad Vail Regatta the Western version
of the Eastern Sprints; and other regattas
of more limited participation. And of course,
there are the English, Olympic, and International
competitions in which American colleges and
clubs compete on invitation or on the initiative
of stimulated successful crews. |
|